A federal judge declined to issue an injunction that would bar immigration agencies like ICE from carrying out immigration raids in places of worship. The decision came following a complaint from a group of twenty-seven Christian and Jewish organizations representing their migrant congregants. The judge declined the injunction, arguing it wasn’t necessary.
The rollback of policies limiting when immigration arrests could take place in sensitive areas like churches and synagogues prompted the group of religious organizations to sue the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) back in February. The group argued the immigration raids would restrict their ability to practice their faith. They also argued that the policy change would drive down attendance within their congregations.
A federal judge ultimately ruled against the coalition, citing a lack of clear evidence regarding immigration authorities conducting arrests in places of worship. Additionally, the judge argued that the group failed to provide sufficient evidence that policy negatively affected attendance among their congregation. For these reasons, the judge explained, the group lacked legal standing to assert a challenge to the change in policy.
The DHS argued that the change in policy was needed to detain and deport migrants that were using places like schools and churches to avoid arrest. Prior to February, ICE avoided conducting arrests in places of worship unless deemed necessary. The Trump administration rescinded this policy, encouraging immigration agents to take a case-by-case approach towards making arrests in houses of worship. The DHS further clarified that the change in policy was meant to make immigration arrests in these locations easier, and not to make religious establishments a target.
As always, ILBSG actively monitors ongoing U.S. immigration news. If you have questions about any U.S. immigration related issue, contact us. Working with an experienced attorney ensures you get the right advice based on the most recent laws. In an ever-evolving immigration policy landscape, it’s particularly critical.
