News

DHS revealed they used the FBI-ran NCIC database to select targets for student visa terminations, confirming immigration officials' use of computer data bases for enforcement operations.

The State Department announced a new catch-and-revoke policy for visa holders in the United States. Foreign nationals visiting or living in the country legally could lose their visa status if they break the law.

The DOJ has filed a complaint against IDOL for allegedly enforcing policy that allegedly interferes with federal immigration enforcement efforts.

The first one hundred days of President Donald Trump’s second term consist of repeated attempts to undo due process in the immigration system. Through a collection of executive orders, legal actions, and law enforcement, the Trump administration’s efforts have elevated and streamlined the detention and removal process in the United States.

Children of many H-1B holders face uncertainty as their H-4 visas are set to expire at the age of twenty-one, after which they'll no longer qualify as dependents.

The terminated SEVIS records of some international students have been restored. It's unknown which individuals these restorations affect, and students should speak their DSOs to find out if they're among them.

A rising number of U.S. citizens have been told by immigration agencies to leave the country. These instances are creating a great amount of confusion, as it’s unknown if U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) really told citizens to leave, or if its merely a glitch in the system.

The expansion of DHS, USCIS, and FBI engagement with immigration enforcement is facilitating removals of green card holders. This is done through wellness checks, conducted by FBI agents on migrant children.

H-1B holders are facing mounting layoffs amid an increasingly strict immigration landscape where removal is a real possibility. They must take the necessary precautions to minimize chances of confrontation with immigration authorities.

A federal judge declined to issue a bar on ICE's ability to detain migrants in places of worship. The judge argued that there was no evidence that places like churches were not being actively targeted at this time.